Programs A & C
I saw four different dances, and here are my very gut reactions to each one.
Double Exposure, RAWDance
The best I’ve seen of them and some segments were quite interesting. I’ll go see the larger work, but I am still not sold on them choreographically or as dancers. Why do they only choreograph for themselves? As N said, “They seem a little too self-congratulatory.”
Pupil Suite, Gallim Dance
I’m just going to say it: I was kind of offended (and shocked that N had the same response). There as a part of the dance that crossed a line. I’m sure I opened my mouth in surprise, or scrunched up my nose – did I really just see that? It’s hard to describe, but the movement seemed to be mocking to a degree of maybe not being aware of its potential offensiveness. Didn’t anyone tell them? Am I being too sensitive? Overall, I liked their aesthetic and the first two sections were fantastic. I’m a little confused.
K: “that was the longest 30 minutes of my life”
N: “that was so disappointing”
Probably the most interesting part was when one of them quoted Heidegger. The rest was an utter bore.
The Dance that Documents Itself, Jess Curtis/Gravity
I don’t mind naked bodies on stage, but I need it to mean something. The rest did seem to get at larger issues of digital documentation, subjectivity, etc. I appreciated the moment when Jess stepped out to address the current state of San Francisco’s economy and housing crisis. He recognized that some things just can’t be “danced” and need speech; dance isn’t always the best way to communicate. I was a little surprised that Christy Bollingbroke mentioned that this piece is a “set-up” for the ODC Theater programming for the next season. I am curious to see how that plays out and what it means.